Petitioner sought enforcement of Consent Terms amicably settled between parties; Court disposed of Writ Petition based on admitted settlement marked X.
Writ Petition disposed of in terms of the admitted Consent Terms marked 'X'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neeta Sawant 1/1 905-WP-6334-2022.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
W RIT PETITION NO. 6334 OF 2022
Jaydeep Enterprises Jaydeep Emphasis ...Petitioner
V/s.
Competent Authority and District Dept.
and anr.
...Respondents
Mr. H.N. Thakare a/w. Mr. Josh Gandhi, Ms. Shridi Suryawanshi i/
by. Dua Associates, for the Petitioner.
Ms. V.R. Raje, AGP for State-Respondent No.1.
Mr. D.S. Kullkarni for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Dated : 22 February 2024.
P.C. :
1)The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Respondent
No.2-Society submit that parties have amicably resolved the disputes
amongst themselves and tender Consent Terms. The Consent Terms
signed by the Petitioner and Chairman and Secretary of Respondent
No.2-Society are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The
signatories are personally present before the Court and admit the
contents of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on
record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The Writ Petition is
disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.
Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2024.02.23 11:50:48 +0530
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT
Jaydeep Enterprises
Competent Authority
District Dept.
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court