Disposed

Raghu Maruti Thorat Deceased v. Joti Krishna Thorat Deceased Thr Lrs and Anr.

Bombay HC7 Mar 2024SA/154/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal over removal of encroachment and ownership claimed through a gift deed that did not specify the gifted area was admitted on three framed questions of law. Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) was continued until the next hearing.

What did the court decide?

Appeal admitted on framed questions of law; record called for; ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) till next date.

Raghu Maruti Thorat Deceased vs Joti Krishna Thorat… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Iresh

¶2

27.154.24 sa.docx

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

SECOND APPEAL NO. 154 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2117 OF 2024 IN

¶6

SECOND APPEAL NO. 154 OF 2024

¶7

Raghu Maruti Thorat Deceased .....Appellant

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Joti Krishna Thorat Deceased

¶10

.....Respondent

¶11

Mr. Kayval P. Shah for appellant

¶12

Mr. Pranav Dessai a/w Mr. Kiran Padalkar and Ashwini Padalkar i/b Padaklkar and Partners for respondents

¶13

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

¶14

DATE : 12^th JULY 2024

¶15

ORDER:

¶16

Heard. Second appeal is admitted on the following substantial

¶17

questions of law:

¶18

(i) Whether the suit for removal of encroachment could have

¶19

Digitally signed by IRESH IRESH MASHAL MASHAL Date: 2024.07.16 12:18:47 +0530

¶20

1/3

¶21

27.154.24 sa.docx

¶22

been decreed by the first Appellate Court by ignoring material factual aspect that the gift relied upon by the plaintiff as a source of title did not provide for any area of the property?

¶23

(ii) Whether the findings of facts recorded by the first Appellate Court regarding ownership of the plaintiff on the suit property i.e. encroached area based on the gift deed which did not contain the area could have been accepted on the basis of oral evidence on record?

¶24

(iii) Whether reversal of findings of facts on record, more particularly the fact that the gift deed did not contain the actual area gifted is sustainable ?

¶25

Mr. Pranav Dessai waives service for respondents.

¶26

Call for record and proceedings.

¶27

Printing is dispensed with.

¶28

Appellant to file private paper-book within a period of one year.

¶29

2/3

¶30

27.154.24 sa.docx

¶31

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2117 OF 2024:

¶32

Rule on interim in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c) is made returnable on 27^th September 2024

¶33

Mr. Pranav Dessai waives service for respondents.

¶34

Till next date there will be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a).

¶35

[GAURI GODSE, J.]

¶36

3/3

Raghu Maruti Thorat Deceased v. Joti Krishna Thorat Deceased Thr Lrs and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raghu Maruti Thorat Deceased v. Joti Krishna Thorat Deceased Thr Lrs and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vishwas Subhash Kadam and Anr. Vs the Honble Minister for Rural Development Dept. and Ors.

Shri. Gajanan Bhausing Pardeshi Thru Poa Ajay G Pardeshi Vs Mr. Kacharu Karbhari Badhe and Ors.

Suchita Sitaram Solim Vs Appellate Officer, Appellate Tribunal and Collector (C.a) Mumbai City and Ors.

Shri. S. S. P (Decd)through Heirs Shri.T.S.P. (Deceased) by Heirs Smt. Laxmibai T. Panaskar andORS Vs Shri. Shripati Bala Pawar (Since Deceased) through His Legal Heirs 1.1.PUTALABAI Sitaram Pawar and

M.M.Shah through His Constituted Attorney Shri Kantilal Ratanshi Gala Vs Union of India through the Director of Estate

Rajaram Babaji Raut and Another Vs Dattatraya Govind Jadhav (Since Deceased)