Petitioner no. 1 allegedly failed to comply with a prior order directing payment of Rs. 1,00,000/-. The court issued show-cause notice regarding contempt action against petitioner no. 1, returnable on 6 August 2024, clarifying it is not notice under Rule 9 of the Contempt of Courts (Bombay High Court) Rules, 1994.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Iresh
50.192.24 revn.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 192 OF 2024
Shadab Imam Shaikh and Ors .....Applicants
Vs.
IRESH MASHAL
Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2024.07.04 19:21:51 +0530
Nilofar Shadab Shaikh and Anr
.....Respondents
Ms. Pooja Phagnekar h/f Mr. Nitesh J. Mohite for the petitioner (Through VC) Mr. Samir A. Kumbhakoni for respondent no. 1 Mr. A. R. Metkari APP for the State
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 3rd JULY 2024
ORDER:
make payment of Rs. 1,00,000/-. Learned counsel for respondent
no. 1 submits that said directions are not complied with.
the order is complied with. She submits that petitioner no. 1 has not
1/2
50.192.24 revn.docx
responded to her communication, hence, she is unable to make any statement with regard to compliance of order dated 3rd May 2024. Prima facie I am of the opinion that petitioner no. 1 has deliberately not complied with the directions. Hence, office is directed to issue notice to petitioner no. 1 to show cause as to why contempt action should not be taken against petitioner no. 1. Notice is made returnable on 6th August 2024.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
Shadab Imam Shaikh and Ors
Nilofar Shadab Shaikh and Anr
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
