Rahul Purushottamji Meshram v. Gauri @ Pranita W/O Rahul Meshram and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Matrimonial dispute revision application referred to mediation with a mediator appointed and directions for the parties to appear, pending which the applicant was directed to pay remaining Rs. 90,000.
What did the court decide?
Matter referred to mediation; applicant directed to pay remaining Rs. 90,000 to non-applicants.
What the court decided
1 40-REVN-18-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (REVN) NO. 18 OF 2024
RAHUL S/O PURUSHOTTAMJI MESHRAM Vrs.
SAU. GAURI @ PRANITA W/O RAHUL MESHRAM AND ANOTHER
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri Kamal Anandani, Advocate for applicant. Shri Amol Mardikar, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM: M. W. CHANDWANI, J. DATE : 03/04/2024.
- Since the dispute is matrimonial one, there are elements of settlement. The matter be sent for mediation.
- Dr. Renuka Sirpurkar, learned counsel is appointed as a Mediator in this case.
- The parties shall appear before the learned Mediator, as per the convenience of the learned Mediator.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rahul s/o Purushottamji Meshram
- respondent
Sau. Gauri @ Pranita w/o Rahul Meshram
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vidhaya Manohar Kumbharkar 2 Others vs Ashwini Tushar Bhilkar.
Pallavi Akshay Rangari vs Akshay Virendra Rangari
Sau. Kusum Parasram Kullarkar vs Shri. Madhukar S/O Pandhari Kullarkar
Smt. Rewata Wd/O. Bhagwan Ingole and Others Vs Union of India, through General Managersouth Central Railway, Secunderabad