Revision against rejection of an Order 7 Rule 11 application seeking rejection of a plaint in a suit challenging a 1991 sale deed as fraudulent and seeking possession and injunction. The High Court heard counsel and issued notice to the non-applicant, returnable within three weeks; no final decision was reached.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 50-cra-10-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2024 Sau. Kusum Parasram Khullarkar
Vs.
Madhukar S/o. Pandhari Kullarkar
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri S. S. Sharma, Advocate for applicant.
CORAM :- M. W. CHANDWANI, J.
DATED :- 09.01.2024
Heard.
RR Jaiswal
2 50-cra-10-24.odt
(M. W. CHANDWANI, J.)
Signed by: Mr. Rajnesh Jaiswal Designation: PA To Honourable Judge RR Jaiswal Date: 09/01/2024 18:26:48
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sau. Kusum Parasram Khullarkar
M. W. Chandwani
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
