A mentioning in a pending public interest litigation; the court directed that the matter not be placed before a Bench of which one member (Amit Borkar, J.) is part. No substantive relief was considered or granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NOB (i)-PIL-69-2024
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 69 OF 2024
Shrimant Namdeo Kadam .. Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Vikram N. Walawalkar for respondent no.4.
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATE: 1st AUGUST, 2024
P.C.:
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed byPRAVIN PRAVIN DASHARATH DASHARATH PANDIT PANDIT Date: 2024.08.01 16:00:11 +0530
1
Shrimant Namdeo Kadam
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
