Cyril Samuel Dara v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Mention in a public interest litigation where counsel sought leave to amend the prayer clause and add grounds. The court stood over the matter to enable the petitioner to move an interim application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
401-PIL-57-2024
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 57 OF 2024
Cyril Samuel Dara .. Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Suhas Shivaji Deokar for petitioner. Smt. Prachi A. Tatake, Addl. Govt. Pleader for respondent nos.1 and 2- State.
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATE: 5th SEPTEMBER, 2024
P.C.:
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to move an Interim Application seeking certain amendments in the prayer clause and for adding certain grounds.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Cyril Samuel Dara
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Ors
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court