PIL regarding incomplete PMGSY road work; State undertook on record to complete the disputed work by 31.5.2024. Petitioner did not press the petition, and the court disposed of the PIL as having served its purpose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:5319-DB
1 926pil9.2023.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 9 OF 2023
(Adv. Arvind Krushnarao Waghmare...Vs… State of Maharashtra and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. A.K. Waghmare, in person,
Mr. N.S. Fulzele, Addl.GP for respondent Nos. 1,24 to 7.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, J J . DATED : 02-05-2024
Advocate Mr. A.K. Waghmare, who appears in person, has not pressed this petition, in view of the following order:
(i) Learned Addl.GP Mr. N.S. Fulzele, on instructions from Mr. S.R. Jadhav, Executive Engineer, PMGSY, MMRDA, Nagpur has stated that the disputed incomplete work shall be completed by 31.5.2024;
(ii) The said officer is physically present in the Court and from page No. 116, he has identified the incomplete work and based on the same, the statement is made.
This Public Interest Litigation has served its purpose. Accordingly, PIL stands disposed of.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Belkhede
Arvind Krushnarao Waghmare
State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
