The High Court allowed an amendment to a writ petition and raised it for decision. The DSGI waived notice. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to be heard after the main trial concludes.
Liberty granted to petitioner to approach after trial is concluded; Civil Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
918-WP-2872-24.od t
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.2872 OF 2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.1309 of 2024
Manish Kumar s/o M.L. Nayak, Bhatapara, Baloda Bazar
-vs-
Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Bhusawal and ors.
Coram, appearances, Court's orders
Court's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and the Registrar's orders.
Shri B. Lahiri, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri N. S. Deshpande, DSGI for respondents.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : April 30, 2024
Civil Application (CAW) No.1309/2024
Writ Petition No.2872/2024
(Abhay J. Mantri, J.) (Nitin W. Sambre, J.)
Asmita
Manish Kumar s/o M.L. Nayak
Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Bhusawal
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
