Amit Uttam Patil v. Lata Amit Patil
Case brief
What is this about?
Miscellaneous civil application where the respondent, though served, was absent. The court granted a last chance to the respondent to proceed with the matter and adjourned it to the next date, continuing earlier ad-interim relief.
What did the court decide?
Ad-interim relief earlier granted to continue till next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
41-MCA-30-24.doc
Gayatri Shimpi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 30 OF 2024
Amit Uttam Patil ….Applicant
Versus
Lata Amit Patil ….Respondent
Ms. Trushna Shah a/w Mr. Pratik Sabrad and Mr. Sarvesh Deshpande, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 19th APRIL, 2024.
P.C. :
- Heard learned counsel for the Applicant. Though
Respondent serve, none present in for Respondent.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Amit Uttam Patil
- respondent
Lata Amit Patil
Coram
Shivkumar Dige
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court