Miscellaneous civil application dismissed for want of prosecution after repeated non-appearance of parties and counsel on multiple dates of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:1825
1
02.22MCA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
915 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2 OF 2022
RUPALI SATISH THAKAR VERSUS
SATISH GORAKSHANATH THAKAR
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 24.01.2024
P.C. :
1] When this matter was called on 24th March, 2023, this Court has passed the following order :
“1. None for the parties. 2. Stand over to 10.04.2023.”
2] Thereafter, on 3rd January, 2024 when this matter was called, none appeared for the parties. This Court on 3rd January, 2024 passed the following order :
“1. None present for the parties even on second call.
3] Even today, none appears for the parties. The present Misc. Civil Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE
DDC
Rupali Satish Thakar
Satish Gorakshanath Thakar
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
