Haresh Laxman Payer v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application with an intervention application by the first informant seeking to appear in person. The verification committee gave a negative report; the court adjourned to allow him to engage an advocate and continued earlier ad-interim relief.
What the court decided
18-aba-383-24
1 of 2
Gokhale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 383 OF 2024
Shyam Kaluram Bhoir & Anr. ..Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 993 OF 2024 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 383 OF 2024
Mr. Kedar J. Patil a/w. Sakshi S. Kadam, Gargi Joshi and Pratik Tare for Applicants.
Ms. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 5 SEPTEMBER 2024
P.C. :
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shyam Kaluram Bhoir & Anr.
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Sarang V. Kotwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court