Adjournment order in an interim application filed in a first appeal (stamp) against the Union of India. No arguments were heard as no parties or counsel appeared; the matter was simply stood over to a future date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-IA-8952-2024 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8952 OF 2024
IN
FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 25846 OF 2023
Anita Narayan Tapse & Ors. ...Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Anita Narayan Tapse & Ors. ...Appellants
Versus
Union of India, Through General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai ...Respondent
None for the Applicants/Appellants. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
DATE : 17 DECEMBER 2024
P.C.:
[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]
Digitally signed by GITALAXMI GITALAXMI KRISHNA KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2024.12.21 14:44:38 +0530
Page 1 of 1
Gitalaxmi
Anita Narayan Tapse & Ors.
Anita Narayan Tapse & Ors.
Union of India, Through General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai
Advait M. Sethna
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
