Anticipatory bail application listed for directions; the court allowed an intervention application, directed impleadment of the first informant as respondent, permitted a reply affidavit within one week, and adjourned the matter by consent to the next date with no coercive action meanwhile.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SMITA SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVES GONSALVES Date: 2024.07.16 15:36:45+0530
15.aba1584-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1584 OF 2024
Snehalkumar Ashwinbhai Savani ... Applicant v/s.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents WITH INTERVENTION APPLICATION NO.2472 OF 20204 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1584 OF 2024
... Bharat Vanmalibhai Modiya Applicant
In the matter between Snehalkumar Ashwinbhai Savani ... Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr Prithviraj S Gole, for the Applicant. Mr Amit A Palkar, APP, for Respondent State. Mr Aarif Ali M Ali, for the Intervenor. API Mahesh Kadam, Vile Parle Police Station, Mumbai, present.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J.
Date : 16 July 2024
P.C. :
. Leave to amend forthwith. Learned Counsel for the applicant, who is the first informant in this case, has recorded his no
Page 1 of 2 _______________________________________________ 16 July 2024
15.aba1584-24.doc
sg
objection to allow the intervention application.
16 July 2024
Page 2 of 2
Snehalkumar Ashwinbhai Savani
State of Maharashtra
Bharat Vanmalibhai Modiya
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
