Interim application seeking condonation of a four-day delay in filing a first appeal. Respondents served but absent. The court found the delay neither substantial nor unexplained and allowed the application in terms of prayer clause (a).
Delay of four days in filing the First Appeal condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30-IA-6493-2024 IN FAST-16116-2022.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6493 OF 2024
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 16116 OF 2022
Pushpa Maohar Dawane & Ors …Applicants
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Pushpa Maohar Dawane & Ors …Appellants
Versus
Hemant Pandurang Mhatre & Ors …Respondents
Mr Shubham H Misar , for the Applicants.
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2024.11.14 17:14:18 +0530
PC:-
CORAM: ARIF S. DOCTOR, J DATED: 14th November 2024
Page 1 of 2
30-IA-6493-2024 IN FAST-16116-2022.DOC
Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads as follows:
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J)
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the four-day delay in filing the First Appeal should be condoned.
Pushpa Maohar Dawane & Ors
Pushpa Maohar Dawane & Ors
Hemant Pandurang Mhatre & Ors
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
