Court disposed of Suit No.59 of 2024 based on consent terms settled between Plaintiffs and Defendants 1 and 2. Suit against other Defendants was dismissed; fee refund granted.
Suit disposed on consent terms; Suit against other Defendants dismissed; court fee refund granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 8-IA(L) 1973-23@ S 59-24.doc
Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2024.09.25 12:32:11 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.59 OF 2024
(NOT ON BOARD)
Richard Mamod Riajhouseen Tahora & Anr. … Plaintiffs V/s.
Jitendra S. Brahmbhatt & Ors. … Defendants
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.1973 OF 2023
IN
SUIT NO.59 OF 2024
Adv. Birrul Mohamedi i/by Bellator Legal Services LLP for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Rajendra Jain i/by Namrata Agashe for Defendant Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 24TH SEPTEMBER 2024
P.C. :
and differences between the parties to the Suit have been settled. The execution of the consent terms has been duly verified by the affirming officer of this Court. The report of the affirming officer is annexed to the consent terms. The
said consent terms are thus taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
Mugdha
1 of 2
2 8-IA(L) 1973-23@ S 59-24.doc
Nos.1 and 2 and hence the Suit qua the other Defendants is dismissed.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
Mugdha
2 of 2
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
