Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd,Mumbai v. Mrs. Sujata Sudhakar Kawle and Anr.

Bombay HC3 Jul 2024IA/487/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Registrar's procedural order on an interim application in a first appeal (stamp): notices to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 were returned unserved and the applicant took no steps within the prescribed period under Chapter VII, Rule 6(1)(e) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. Instead of outright dismissal, two further weeks were granted to serve the notices, failing which the application would stand dismissed against the unserved respondents without further reference.

What the court decided

AI extract

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd,Mumbai… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 487 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 31568 OF 2023

¶3

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 19/09/2024

¶6

None present

¶7

The notices issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are returned unserved. Therefore, the above numbered Interim Application is listed on the board of registrar for second time for taking steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 2. However, learned advocate for applicant has neither taken any steps nor supplied proper and correct addresses of respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶8

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 6 (1) (e) of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960, Immediately after the expiry of the period prescribed under the foregoing sub-rule of this rule for taking the requisite steps for the issue of fresh notice or or supplying postal stamps to cover the postal and registration charges, the office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which steps have not been taken for the issue of fresh notices or the postal stamps to cover the postal and registration charges have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the

¶9

Registrar shall dismiss the matter for failure to prosecute.:

¶10

As such, the prescribed time to take steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 2 as provided under Rule 1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to take steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶11

In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to take appropriate steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 2 without fail. On failure, Interim Application would stand dismissed against unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 2 without further reference to the Court of Registrar.

¶12

Sd/-

¶13

REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶14

sat-R(J-II)-19.09.2024

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd,Mumbai v. Mrs. Sujata Sudhakar Kawle and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd,Mumbai v. Mrs. Sujata Sudhakar Kawle and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shri. Chandrakant Shankar Machale vs Shri. Ashok Bhairu Mohite, Thr. P.A. Shri. Yashwant Bhairu Mohit (Res. 1 to 9) and Ors.

Chetna Rajendra Kansara Alias Chetna Prakash Panchal vs Shashikant Balakrishna Mistri and Anr.

Nayan a Bheda and Others vs the Ghee Merchants Association

Hanmant Krishna Narute and Anr. vs Jt. Charity Commissioner, Pune and Ors.

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Kanta Mukesh Hadiya and Ors.

Illahi Mahammad Lakadwale vs Yashwant Kondiba Mule (Deceased)