High Court allowed withdrawal of appeal by appellants with liberty to approach trial Court, disposed of impugned order and pending application, and directed expediting hearing.
Appeal from order stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
32-ao-257-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 257 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3504 OF 2023 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 257 OF 2023
M/s. Shivam Constructions and Anr. ..Appellants Vs. Shri Milind Raghunath Gurav and Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Girish Agrawal i/b. P. D. Dalvi, for the Appellants (through VC).
Mr. Ajay Das, for the Respondents No.8 to 10. Mr. R. V. Dighe i/b. A. S. Rao, for the Respondent No.11.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 22 APRIL 2024
P.C.
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.04.2214:39:51+0530
. After hearing the matter for some time, the learned counsel for the appellants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty to take appropriate steps before the trial Court.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
M/s. Shivam Constructions and Anr.
Shri Milind Raghunath Gurav and Ors.
R. N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
