Disposed

Abdul Gani Abdul Razzak Shaikh v. Abdul Kadir Ammubhai Momin

Bombay HC19 Apr 2024SA/131/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a second appeal regarding a dispute over suit property, the contesting parties amicably settled their disputes via a notarized Memorandum of Understanding. The appeal was disposed of upon the consent decree terms involving monetary payment and handover of possession.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed; parties to comply with agreed terms in Consent Decree including payment and handover of property.

Abdul Gani Abdul Razzak Shaikh Vs Abdul Kadir Ammubhai Momin — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE SANJAY Date: SONAWANE 2024.04.19 Chitra Sonawane. 20:08:59+0530 1 12-SA-131-2010.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

Second Appeal No.131 of 2010

¶4

a/w

¶5

Interim Application No.1765 of 2023

¶6

a/w

¶7

Interim Application No.7250 of 2024

¶8

¶9

Second Appeal No.131 of 2010

¶10

Abdul Gani Abdul Razzak Shaikh .… Appellant. Vs. Abdul Kadir Ammubhai Momin (since deceased) through his LR's 1(a) Smt Rafika Kadir Momin & Ors. .... Respondents.

¶11

Mr Sachin Punde for appellant.

¶12

Mr SR Page a/w Archana Joglekar a/w Ruchi Umrotkar for respondents No.1A and 1B. Ms Ashwini B. Jadhav i/by Sanjay Ghaisas for respondents Nos.2A and 2B.

¶13

Coram : R. N. Laddha, J. Date : 19 April 2024.

¶14

P.C. :

¶15

Learned Counsel for the parties jointly submit that the parties have arrived at an agreement/arrangement in terms of which this second appeal can be disposed of and placed on record the Minutes of the Order, which is taken on record and marked as "X"

¶16

Chitra Sonawane. 2 12-SA-131-2010.doc

¶17

for identification.

¶18

Given the above, the present Appeal stands disposed of in the following terms :

¶19

MINUTES OF THE ORDER

¶20

"1) The contesting parties have amicable settled their disputes. The Appellant and Respondents No. 1(a) and 1(b) have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 26/12/2023 and the same is notarized before a notary Public on 02/01/2024. A copy of the said Memorandum of Understanding is annexed to Interim Application No. 7250 of 2024 and the Appellant and Respondents No. 1(a) and 1(b) confirms the terms and conditions of the said notarized Memorandum of Understanding dated 26/12/2023.

¶21

It has been agreed between the parties that the Appellant will withdraw the entire amount of Rs. 4,20,000/(Rupees Four Lac Twenty Thousand Only), which is deposited by him in this Honourable High Court, along with accrued interest thereon. Therefore, the Registry of this Honourable Court may be directed to pay an amount of Rs. 4,20,000/(Rupees Four Lac Twenty Thousand Only) to the Appellant along with accrued interest.

¶22

The Respondents No. 1(a) and 1(b) will pay an amount of Rs.12,00,000/(Rupees Twelve Lacs Only) to the Appellant on or before 31/07/2024 .

¶23

1. The Appellant upon receipt of the aforesaid both amounts will hand over the possession of

¶24

Chitra Sonawane. 3 12-SA-131-2010.doc

¶25

the Suit Property (tented premises) ie. Two Rooms each admeasuring 12 feet by 10 feet together with loft and eastern-side gallery situated on the third floor in the building situated on CTS No. 1741 Shukrawar Peth, Pune to the Respondents No. 1(a) and 1(b).

¶26

Thus, upon above terms the Appellant withdraws the present Second Appeal.

¶27

Liberty to the parties to approach this Honourable High Court in the event of difficulty in compliance of Minutes of Order."

¶28

In view of this, office to draw a Consent Decree as per the Minutes of the Order. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly. As a sequel, the pending interim applications also stand disposed of.

¶29

R. N. Laddha, J. ]

Abdul Gani Abdul Razzak Shaikh v. Abdul Kadir Ammubhai Momin

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Gani Abdul Razzak Shaikh v. Abdul Kadir Ammubhai Momin

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Samir Bhalchandra Gondke Vs State of Maharashtra

Jaysingh Manohar Nagvekar Vs Jagruti Jaysingh Nagvekar

Walid Niyaz Ahmed Wagoo Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited vs Sudhakar Shanbhag

Lake City Dry Fruits Private Limited Thr. Its Dir.Mr. Vishal Rajendra Jain Vs M/S. Chandraprakash Ramnarayan Oza (Partnership Firm) and Others

Lake City Dry Fruits Private Limited Thr. Its Dir.Mr. Vishal Rajendra Jain Vs M/S. Chandraprakash Ramnarayan Oza and Others