Bail application withdrawn after the Court indicated it was not inclined to grant interim relief, with liberty to renew after six months if trial does not progress.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.04.22 GONSALVES 17:35:12 +0530
3.ba710-23.doc
sg
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.710 OF 2023
Aslam Ali Mohammad Hatim Ali Shaikh ... Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr Sachin Pawar, for the Applicant.
Mr Ashok Gawai, APP, for Respondent State.
Mr PP Deore, PSI, Padgha Police Station, along with XYZ - Respondent No.2, present.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J. Date : 22 April 2024
P.C. :
. After hearing the matter for some time, when the Court was not inclined to grant interim relief to the applicant, the learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to renew his request after six months, if the trial is not progressed.
1 of 1
Aslam Ali Mohammad Hatim Ali Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
XYZ - Respondent No.2
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
