Disposed
Arun Kumar Agrawal v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCIA/3013/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
15-aba-1878-2024.doc
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.09.0915:57:34+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1878 of 2024
Subodh Kumar Goel ...Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
With
Interim Application No. 3013 of 2024
in
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1878 of 2024
Arun Kumar Agrawal ...Applicant / Intervenor
In the matter between
Subodh Kumar Goel ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Devashish Godbole a/w. Mr. Prasad Nagargoje, for the Applicant. Mr. Yogesh Y. Dabke , APP for the Respondent – State. Mr. Amresh Sharma, for the Intervenor.
API Gajanan Bharti, PSI Umaji Kadam, Dindoshi Police Station is present.
Coram: R. N. Laddha, J. Date: 9 September 2024
P.C.
. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks one week’s time to file reply affidavit. Time granted as prayed for.
Page 1 of 2
Mamta Kale
15-aba-1878-2024.doc
R. N. Laddha, J.
Page 2 of 2
Subodh Kumar Goel
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Arun Kumar Agrawal
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court