Allowed

Maya Motilal Lulla v. Ramkrishin Harbhagwandas Lulla (Deceased)

Bombay HC3 Sept 2024IA/2579/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an interim application for post-grant amendment of a Succession Certificate. The court permitted correcting the petitioner's relationship from 'widow' to 'daughter-in-law' and adding securities (Nos. 91-170) to the schedule, directing necessary amendments within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Necessary amendment in accordance with the Schedule of amendment (Exhibit B) allowed to be carried out within three weeks; post-amendment grant expedited.

Maya Motilal Lulla vs Ramkrishin Harbhagwandas… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-OS:17378

¶2

22 ia 2579 of 2024.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2579 OF 2024

¶4

¶5

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.2691 OF 2023

¶6

Maya Motilal Lulla … Applicant/Petitioner

¶7

Ramkrishin Harbhagwandas Lulla … Deceased

¶8

Mr. Jotiram R. Jadhav i/by Mr. Hemant Hansale, for Applicant.

¶9

CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J.

¶10

DATE : 22 OCTOBER 2024

¶11

P.C.

¶12

Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant.

¶13

This application is preferred for post grant amendment in the Succession Certificate in respect of the securities belonging to Ramkrishin H. Lulla (deceased), granted by an order dated 28 November 2023.

¶14

The applicant avers, in the cause title of the Petition, it was incorrectly mentioned that the Petitioner is a widow of the deceased, instead of daughter in law of the deceased, and, post grant, the applicant/Petitioner has realized that the deceased was also holding securities listed in the Schedule of amendment at Nos.91 to 170. It is, therefore, necessary to amend the Petition and the grant.

¶15

By an order dated 24 September 2024, the Applicant was directed to file an additional affidavit so as to annex copies of the securities which are

¶16

SSP 1/2

¶17

22 ia 2579 of 2024.doc sought to be added by way of amendment in the Schedule of securities. The applicant has filed an additional affidavit. Copies of the share certificates are annexed to the additional affidavit.

¶18

The claim of amendment in the Schedule of securities stands substantiated by the averments in the additional affidavit and the copies of the share certificates / documents annexed thereto. I am, therefore, inclined to allow the application.

¶19

The application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

¶20

Necessary amendment in accordance with the Schedule of amendment (Exhibit B) be carried out within a period of three weeks from the date of uploading of this order.

¶21

Post amendment, grant expedited.

¶22

Interim Application stands disposed.

¶23

( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )

¶24

SSP 2/2

¶25

Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/10/2024 11:19:22

Maya Motilal Lulla v. Ramkrishin Harbhagwandas Lulla (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maya Motilal Lulla v. Ramkrishin Harbhagwandas Lulla (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anil Vithoba Medhekar vs Subhadra Vithoba Medhekar (Deceased)

Sunanda Suresh Yadav vs Baby Krishna Powar Alias Bebi Krishna Powar (Deceased)

Heena Dhirajlal Manek vs Mahendra Tikamdas Shah and Ors.

Krishnan Chandran @ Kannan vs Shivkumar Ganesh (Petitioner) and K. Chandran (Deceased)

Nemin Sidharth Shah vs Sidharth Manubhai Shah (Deceased)

Priti Nilesh Jain vs Nileshkumar Javerchand Jain Alias Nilesh Javerchand Jain Alias Nilesh J Jain (Deceased)