Allowed

Sunanda Suresh Yadav v. Baby Krishna Powar Alias Bebi Krishna Powar (Deceased)

Bombay HC2 Sept 2024JOT/130/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court in the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction granted permission to the petitioner to sell the deceased's property in Mumbai after confirming consent from other legal heirs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to sell the room No.125, Building No.3, Ashtavinayak (SRA) Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Bandra (East), Mumbai belonging to the deceased.

Sunanda Suresh Yadav vs Baby Krishna Powar Alias… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

19JOT130-2024.DOC

¶2

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI

¶3

Santosh

¶4

Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.09.03 17:23:30 +0530

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

¶6

JUDGE’S ORDER NO. 130 OF 2024 IN

¶7

PETITION NO. 3951 OF 2023

¶8

Sunanda Suresh Yadav

¶9

Baby Krishna Powar alias Bebi Krishna Powar

¶10

...Petitioner

¶11

…Deceased

¶12

Ms. V. Nirmala Gopal, for the Petitioner.

¶13

CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 2^nd SEPTEMBER, 2024

¶14

PC:-

¶15

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner.

¶16

This Judge’s Order is taken out to seeking permission

¶17

to sell the property i.e. Room No.125, Building No.3, Ashtavinayak (SRA) Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Bandra (East), Mumbai, belonging to the deceased Baby Krishna Powar alias Bebi Krishna Powar (the deceased).

¶18

In TP/3951/2023, pursuant to an order dated 2^nd May, 2024 Letters of Administration with Will annexed to the property and credits of the deceased have been granted to the petitioner, being one of the legal representatives of the sole legatee named under the said Will. Pursuant to the aforesaid

¶19

1/2

¶20

19JOT130-2024.DOC

¶21

grant of Letter of Administration, the said property has been transferred in the name of the petitioner in the record of Ashtavinayak (SRA) Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Bandra (East), Mumbai.

¶22

The petitioner desires to sell the subject premises. An agreement has been executed between the petitioner and Ms. Tanisha Chetan Kumar Shende, the prospective purchaser, for the sale of the subject premises, for a consideration of Rs.53,00,000/-.

¶23

I have perused the affidavit in support of the Judge’s Order. The petitioner has affirmed that the other legal heirs of the deceased have filed affidavits giving their consent for the sale of subject premises. The petitioner has undertaken to distribute the said proceeds amongst the heirs of the deceased in accordance with their respective shares. The consent affidavits of the heirs of the deceased are filed at Exhibits ‘E’ to ‘I’. I am satisfied that permission for sale of the subject premises can be granted.

¶24

Judge’s Order is accepted and signed separately.

¶25

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]

¶26

2/2

Sunanda Suresh Yadav v. Baby Krishna Powar Alias Bebi Krishna Powar (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunanda Suresh Yadav v. Baby Krishna Powar Alias Bebi Krishna Powar (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tanya Vaibhav Karnik and Anr. vs Yvonne Fernandes (Deceased)

Sushma Dhirender Puri vs Brij Mohan Maraj (Deceased)

Neha Wo Anil Pawar @ Neha Do Lobha Rathod vs Anil So Ramaji Pawar

Immelda Mendes vs Olivia D'Sa (Deceased)

Rustam C. Patel vs Cawasji N. Patel (Deceased)

Brendan Jude DSouza vs Alexander Sylvester Dsouza alias Alexander Patrick Dsouza (Deceased)