The High Court was hearing an Arbitration Appeal and interim application seeking an extension of time under Rule 596 of the Bombay High Court Rules, 1980. The court granted an extension of time of one week.
Extended time to take necessary steps by one week from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.110 OF 2024
ALONG WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1955 OF 2024 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.226 OF 2024
Kapil Natwarlal Gor and Anr. .. Appellants
Vs.
Nutal Realty, Goregaon, Mumbai and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Rubin Vakil with Ms. Isha Thaker, Advocates, i/by Vimadalal & Co., for the Appellants.
Ms. Sneha Vani, Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 to 10.
Ms. Pooja Yadav, Advocate, i/by Mr. Sunil Sonawane, for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR &
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ
DATE : 2ND JULY, 2024.
P.C. :
1/1
Digitally signed by SNEHA ABHAY 902-APP-110-2024 & IA-1955-2024.doc DIXIT Dixit Date: 2024.07.02 14:34:18 +0530
SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kapil Natwarlal Gor and Anr.
Natal Realty, Goregaon, Mumbai and Ors.
A.S. CHANDURKAR
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
