Procedural order in an arbitration appeal recording the Court Receiver's report: symbolic possession of the suit flat was taken and respondents nos.7 to 10 appointed as agents of the Court Receiver, serving the praecipe.
Praecipe allowed; Court Receiver's report taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.110 OF 2024 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.226 OF 2024
Kapil Natwarlal Gor and Anr. .. Appellants Vs. Nutan Realty, Goregaon, Mumbai and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Rubin Vakil with Ms. Isha Thakur, Advocates, i/by Vimadalal & Co., for the Appellants.
Mr. S.K. Dhekale, Court Receiver, with Mr. N.C. Pawar, O.S.D., Court Receiver.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR &
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ
DATE : 9TH JULY, 2024.
P.C. :
We have perused the report submitted by the Court Receiver dated 9th July 2024. The same is taken on record and marked “A” for identification. Since symbolic possession of the suit flat has been taken and the respondent nos.7 to 10 have been appointed as the agents of the Court Receiver, the purpose of filing the praecipe stands served. Ordered accordingly.
[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]
20-APP-110-2024-Corrected Order Pursuant to Speaking to Minutes Order dt. 22-07-2024.doc
Digitally signed by SNEHA SNEHAABHAY ABHAY DIXIT Dixit DIXIT Date:2024.07.24 10:54:43 +0530
1/1
Kapil Natwarlal Gor
Nutan Realty, Goregaon, Mumbai
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
