A civil application filed in a pending second appeal came before the Bombay High Court. The court heard the applicants and directed that notice be issued to the respondents, returnable on a stated date. Nothing substantive was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-ia-1266-2024 in cas-20-2010.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2010
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1266 OF 2024 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 573 OF 1990
Appalal Jamal Khalif (Deceased) through his Legal Heirs and Ors. ..Applicants Vs. Babalal Ismail Khalif (Deceased) through his Legal Heirs and Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Manoj Pagonda Patil a/w. Mr. Akash Murudkar i/b. Mr. Gaurav Nankar, for the Applicants.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 8 FEBRUARY 2024
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.02.0814:26:18+0530
P.C.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
Mamta Kale
Appalal Jamal Khalif (Deceased) through his Legal Heirs and Ors.
Babalal Ismail Khalif (Deceased) through his Legal Heirs and Ors.
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
