Petitioner challenged an order allowing condonation of delay. The Court held that an alternate remedy exists under Section 257 MLRC. Petition was dismissed without examining merits.
Petition dismissed with liberty to adopt alternate remedy; Interim Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:8138
58.6674.23 wp.docx
Iresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6674 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION ST NO. 2933 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6674 OF 2023
Maruti Tukaram Kudle and Ors .....Petitioners
Vs.
Mr. Ramji Arjun Pathak Decd. .....Respondents Decd Thr. LHRs and ors
Mr. Sandeep B Satkar for the petitioners Mr. Amit Ashok Gharte for Respondent Mr. A. P. Vanarase, AGP for the State
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 7th FEBRUARY 2024.
P.C.
1/2
58.6674.23 wp.docx
condonation of delay filed by the respondents before the SubDivisional Officer has been allowed.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
Signed by: Iresh S. Mashal Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/02/2024 20:06:30
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Court will entertain a petition regarding an order allowing condonation of delay when an alternate remedy under the MLRC is available.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maruti Tukaram Kudle and Ors
Mr. Ramji Arjun Pathak Decd. Chainable Thr. LHRs and ors
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
