Disposed

Shri Laxman Fakira Jondhale v. Shri Suresh Mahadu Jondhale and Ors.

Bombay HC8 Feb 2024CAW/2038/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Procedural orders in a 2001 writ petition condoning delay in three civil applications to bring on record heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondents and permitting substitution of a deceased respondent; matter listed for further hearing.

What did the court decide?

Delay condoned in three civil applications; heirs brought on record and substitution permitted; amendments within two weeks.

Shri Laxman Fakira Jondhale Vs Shri Suresh Mahadu… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

219.4682.01 wp.docx

2024:BHC-AS:6772

Iresh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 4682 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2038 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4682 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2036 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4682 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2037 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4682 OF 2001

¶7

Shri Laxman Fakira Jondhale .....Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Shri Suresh Mahadu Jondhale and Ors .....Respondents

¶10

Mr. Girish R. Agrawal for the petitioner Ms. Rukmini Khairnar i/b Mr. Pramod Joshi (through VC) for Respondent

¶11

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

¶12

DATE : 8^th FEBRUARY 2024.

P.C.

1/3

219.4682.01 wp.docx

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2036 OF 2018:

¶17

This Application is for bringing on record names of heirs and legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 2. There is delay in filing this Application. Heirs of Respondent No. 2 are represented.

¶18

For the reasons stated in the Application, delay is condoned. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b), (c) and (d).

¶19

Amendment to be carried out within two weeks.

¶20

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2037 OF 2018:

¶21

This Application is for bringing on record names of heirs and legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 3. There is delay in filing this Application. Heirs of Respondent No. 3 are represented.

¶22

For the reasons stated in the Application, delay is condoned. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b), (c) and (d).

¶23

Amendment to be carried out within two weeks.

¶24

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2038 OF 2018:

¶25

By this Application, the Applicants have prayed to substitute the

¶26

2/3

¶27

219.4682.01 wp.docx

¶28

name of Respondent No. 5 by heirs who are already on record in different capacity.

¶29

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the Application is condoned. The Petitioners are permitted to carry out amendment for showing Respondent No. 5 as deceased and represented through heirs who are already on record.

¶30

Amendment to be carried out within two weeks.

¶31

List the Writ Petition on 22^nd February 2024.

¶32

[GAURI GODSE, J.]

¶33

3/3

¶34

Signed by: Iresh S. Mashal Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 12/02/2024 15:39:47

Shri Laxman Fakira Jondhale v. Shri Suresh Mahadu Jondhale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Laxman Fakira Jondhale v. Shri Suresh Mahadu Jondhale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maruti Tukaram Kudle and Ors. Vs Mr. Ramji Arjun Phatak Decd Thru Lhrs and Ors.

Digitech Electornic Systems Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs Shreeji Chambers Premises Co-Op Soc. Ltd. and Anr.

Dnyaneshwar Vasudev Bhilare Vs the Chief Officer , Raigad Zilla Parishad and Ors.

Shri.Vishwanath Murlidhar Desai Vs Shri. Shivram Bandu Burde and Others.

Ashit Rohit Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Appalal Jamal Khalif (Deceased through His Legal Heirs) vs Babalal Ismail Khalif (Deceased through His Legal Heirs)