Court considered necessity of issuing notice to Respondent No.3. Files compiled by parties. Case stood over to 11 October 2024. No final decision recorded.
Appellant to clarify necessity of issuing notice to Respondent No.3. Stood over to 11th October 2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21-FA-773-2022+IA-11997-2024+XOB(ST)-24209-2024-IN-773-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed
by SATISH
RAMCHANDRA
SATISH SANGAR
RAMCHANDRA
SANGAR Date:
2024.09.30
18:44:56
+0530
FIRST APPEAL NO.773 OF 2022 WITH
CROSS OBJECTION STAMP NO.24209 OF 2024
Reliance General Insurance Company Limited ...Appellant/Applicant vs. Tatyasaheb Bapu Kamble and Ors. ...Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.11997 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.773 OF 2022 Tatyasaheb Bapu Kamble and Anr. ...Applicants In the matter between :- Reliance General Insurance Company Limited ...Appellant vs. Tatyasaheb Bapu Kamble and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Ms.Rina Kundu:Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 27th SEPTEMBER 2024 Satish Sangar 1/2
21-FA-773-2022+IA-11997-2024+XOB(ST)-24209-2024-IN-773-2022.doc
P. C. :-
. Respondent No.3
Satish Sangar
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notice is required to be issued to Respondent No.3 before proceeding.
Reliance General Insurance Company Limited
Tatyasaheb Bapu Kamble
S. M. MODAK
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
