Application to restore a writ petition dismissed for non-removal of office objections. The court found the 65-day delay neither inordinate nor deliberate, restored the petition on terms, and directed removal of office objections within three weeks failing which the petition would stand dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-IA-7983-24.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7983 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION STAMP NO. 5105 OF 2020
Chandrakant Sitaram Marathe and Ors. … Applicants/ Petitioners Versus Indira Sitaram Narvekar ... Respondents Deceased by heirs and Ors.
Mr. Saurabh M. Railkar, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATED : 26th AUGUST, 2024.
P.C. :
1/2
4-IA-7983-24.doc
S.S.Kilaje
neither inordinate nor deliberate.
( R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Digitally signed SONALI by SONALISATISH SATISH KILAJEDate: KILAJE 2024.08.2712:13:54 +0700
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 65-day delay in seeking restoration of the writ petition dismissed for non-removal of office objections was deliberate or inordinate?
Chandrakant Sitaram Marathe and Ors.
Indira Sitaram Narvekar (deceased) by heirs and Ors.
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
