Mohd. Rafik Abdul Samad Shaikh@Shankar v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order directing the State counsel to examine evidence on the appellant's conspiracy involvement under IPC 120-B and ascertain the role of accused No.4 from witness depositions regarding conviction.
What the court decided
CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV Digitally signed byCHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV Date: 2024.11.22 18:20:01 +0530
1/3 28-Ia-1199-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1199 OF 2024
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3811 OF 2023
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 519 OF 2019 WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 519 OF 2019
Mohd. Rafik Abdul Samad Shaikh @ .. Applicant Shankar
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the counsel should examine evidence regarding the appellant's involvement in the conspiracy and the role of accused No.4.
Whether a short note needs to be prepared reflecting the involvement of the present Appellant under Section 120-B IPC.
Whether to ascertain the role of accused No.4 from depositions and corroborative material placed before the trial Judge.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohd. Rafik Abdul Samad Shaikh @ Shankar
- appellant
Ravindra Sitaram Varerkar
- appellant
Pankaj Nankhu Singh
- appellant
Vishwanath Maranna Shetty
- appellant
Dinesh Bhawarlal Bhandari @ Lalji
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court