Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. Coronation Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-CARAP-173-2024 (OS).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Commercial Arbitration Application NO. 173 OF 2024
Aditya Birla Finance Limited ...Applicant Versus Coronation Infrastructure Pvt Ltd ...Respondent ____________________________________
Vishal Maheshwari a/w. Kimini Pansare i/b. VM Legal, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 25 OCTOBER 2024
P.C.:
- Mr. Maheshwari, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that a soft copy of the Arbitration Application has been served on the respondent and affidavit of service has been filed.
- He further submits that the applicant also tried to serve the respondent by speed post. However, the said packet of the speed post came back with remark “addressee left”.
- When the matter was called out, none appears for the respondent.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Aditya Birla Finance Limited
- respondent
Coronation Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Coram
RAJESH S. PATIL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court