Disposed

Govind Dattu Patil and Ors. v. Joint Charity Commissioner, Kolhapur Division, Kolhapur and Ors.

Bombay HC21 Aug 2024IA/11897/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Registrar's procedural order on an interim application in a first appeal where the appellant failed to supply copies for issuing notice despite two weeks' time. One further opportunity of two weeks was granted, with automatic dismissal against respondents no. 2, 4 and 5 on default.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks granted to supply copies; on failure the interim application stands dismissed against respondents no. 2, 4 and 5 automatically.

Govind Dattu Patil and Ors. vs Joint Charity… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11897 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 21199 OF 2024

¶3

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 27/09/2024

¶6

None Present

¶7

The above numbered interim application is listed for second time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already two weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting two weeks time, the Advocate for the Appellant has not supplied copies for issuing Notice to the respondent no. 2, 4 and 5.

¶8

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss

¶9

all such matters for failure to prosecute.

¶10

As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

¶11

In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, the interim application would stand dismissed against respondent no. 2, 4 and 5 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, notice returnable date be extended by 10 weeks.

¶12

Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶13

sat-R(J-II)-27.09.2024

Govind Dattu Patil and Ors. v. Joint Charity Commissioner, Kolhapur Division, Kolhapur and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govind Dattu Patil and Ors. v. Joint Charity Commissioner, Kolhapur Division, Kolhapur and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jayesh Chunilal Doshi vs Kalavanti Chunilal Doshi (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs. 1A) Mrudula a. Ajmera and Anr.

Shantiben Raniabhai Patel and Ors. vs Chhaganbhai Dedkabhai Dhodi

Ramchandra Babu Shelke and Ors. vs Divisional Joint Registrar of Co. Op Soc and Ors.

Arun Ashok Jahav and Anr. vs Ravindra Dagadu Gaikwad and Ors.

Marzban Faredoon Irani Since Decd. Thr. Lrs vs Raian Faredoon Mazda and Anr.

Dashrath Maruti Mangaonkar vs Shantaram Dashrath Mangaonkar