First appeal hearing adjourned after senior counsel for appellants was heard at length; court noted certain documents were in Marathi and requested translated copies. Matter stood over to 15 January 2025 as part heard.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2024.12.17 18:50:21 +0530
1 3-FA 1120-24 @ IA 10482-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1120 OF 2024
Arun Ashok Jadhav & Anr. … Appellants Vs. Ravindra Dagadu Gaikwad & Ors. … Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10482 OF 2024
Mr. A. V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate a/w S. B. Deshmukh and Irvin Dsouza for the Appellants.
Mr. Vineet Naik, Senior Advocate a/w Ashutosh Kulkarni, Mihir Jaykar i/by Akshay Kulkarni for Respondents Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8 to 10.
Mr. Prasad Kulkarni a/w Jyoti Kawade for Respondent Nos.3 to 6.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 17TH DECEMBER 2024
P.C. :
length.
would be useful to have translated copies of the same.
Mugdha
1 of 2
2 3-FA 1120-24 @ IA 10482-24.doc
Hence, stand over to 15th January 2025 at 2.30 p.m. (part heard).
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
Mugdha
2 of 2
Arun Ashok Jadhav & Anr.
Ravindra Dagadu Gaikwad & Ors.
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
