Interim applications dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure to supply copies and pay process fees despite prior notice. The Registrar granted a further two-week opportunity to comply, failing which the applications would stand dismissed without further reference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11770 OF 2024 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11771 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 22441 OF 2024
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
CORAM : SHRI S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)
DATE : 18/11/2024
Adv. D.D. Rananaware present for the Applicant
The above numbered Interim Applications are listed for second time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already two weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting two weeks time, the Advocate for the Applicant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.
As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as
provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to supply the necessary copies.
In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, the Interim Applications would stand dismissed against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, notice returnable date be extended for ten weeks.
Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)
sat-R(J-II)-18.11.2024
S.R. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
