Disposed

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Satara Division Ltd.Mumbai Thr.Secretary v. Anandi Tanaji Salunkhe and Anr.

Bombay HC19 Aug 2024IA/11770/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Registrar granted two weeks time to supply copies for issuing notices, failing which the interim applications shall stand dismissed. Notice returnable date extended to ten weeks if copies are supplied. The matter was listed for the second time due to default.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks time granted to supply copies; failure leads to dismissal of interim applications. Returnable date for notice extended to ten weeks.

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11770 OF 2024 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11771 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 22441 OF 2024

¶3

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

CORAM : SHRI S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 18/11/2024

¶6

Adv. D.D. Rananaware present for the Applicant

¶7

The above numbered Interim Applications are listed for second time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already two weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting two weeks time, the Advocate for the Applicant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶8

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.

¶9

As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as

¶10

provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

¶11

In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, the Interim Applications would stand dismissed against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, notice returnable date be extended for ten weeks.

¶12

Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶13

sat-R(J-II)-18.11.2024

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Satara Division Ltd.Mumbai Thr.Secretary v. Anandi Tanaji Salunkhe and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Satara Division Ltd.Mumbai Thr.Secretary v. Anandi Tanaji Salunkhe and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Sunil Shivaji Galphade and Ors.

Chola Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd.,Chennai vs Tarabai Dyandev Khot Thr. Poa Suresh Jagannath Khot and Ors.

Chola Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd.,Chennai vs Tarabai Dyandev Khot Thr. Poa Suresh Jagannath Khot and Ors.

Pratik Vilas Gangan vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Satish Jalindar Shinde vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Satish Jalindar Shinde vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.