Interim application seeking condonation of delay of about 37 days in filing a Family Court appeal. The respondent-husband, present in person, requested time to engage an advocate; the court adjourned the matter to 6 December 2024 and directed him to appoint an advocate by then.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.IA.11298.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by AARTI AARTI GAJANAN GAJANAN PALKARDate: PALKAR 2024.11.26 15:55:19 +0530
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.11298 OF 2024 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.20464 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.11299 OF 2024 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.20464 OF 2024
Smita Ninad Parte .. Applicant
Versus
Ninad Eknath Parte .. Respondent
Mr. Rajendra Gorde, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. Ninad Parte, Respondent-Husband is present in Court.
CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 22, 2024
P. C.
of approximately 37 days in filing the above Appeal.
today and stated that he requires time to engage an Advocate. He has
Page 1 of 2 November 22, 2024
Aarti Palkar
17.IA.11298.2024.doc
requested that the matter be adjourned for two weeks for this purpose. Considering the request of the Respondent-Husband who appeared in person, we place the above matter on Board on 6th December, 2024 . The Respondent-Husband shall appoint an Advocate by the next date.
[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]
[B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
Page 2 of 2 November 22, 2024
Aarti Palkar
Smita Ninad Parte
Ninad Eknath Parte
B. P. Colabawalla
Somasekhar Sundaresan
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
