This interim order condones a 50-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, finding the applicant's case sufficient and noting lack of written opposition.
Condonation of delay of 50 days in filing the appeal allowed; office objection to be removed within six weeks failing which appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
946-IA-1111-2024 (OS).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1111 OF 2024 IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL(IT)(ST) NO. 26235 OF 2022
Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 Versus
...Applicant
Majestic Infracom Pvt Ltd ...Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w Ms. Mohinee Chougule, for the Applicant. Mr. Hasan Mushabber i/b Negandhi Shah Himayatulla, for the respondent.
CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.
DATE : 5 DECEMBER 2024
P.C.:
[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]
Page 1 of 1
Mayur Adane, PA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is a sufficient case for condonation of delay in filing the appeal under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 4
Majestic Infracom Pvt Ltd
G. S. Kulkarni
Advait M. Sethna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
