Arjun Ramchandra Patil v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application disposed of as infructuous because the underlying anticipatory bail application was already decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITAJOHNSON Digitally signed by SMITAJOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.06.25 GONSALVES 18:12:28 +0530
25.ia1105-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1105 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 8 OF 2024
Mr Arjun Ramchandra Patil ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr Rohan Kharat, i/b. Shrikant Shirsath, for the Applicant.
Ms Pallavi Dabholkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr SL Sarkte, PSI, MRA Marg Police Station.
Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 25 June 2024
P.C.:
. The learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP jointly state that the present interim application has become infructuous since the anticipatory bail application has already been disposed of.
page 1 of 1
Arjun Ramchandra Patil
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court