Two criminal applications were withdrawn by the applicants' counsel with liberty to approach the Sessions Court; the High Court granted the liberty and dismissed the applications as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2024.05.07 Chitra Sonawane. 15:55:22 1 7 & 8-APL-59 n 60-2024.doc +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Application No.59 of 2024 ... Rehan Iqbal Shaikh Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent.
a/w Cri.Application No.60 of 2024 Vinay Sarwan Mehta ... Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent.
Ms Anima Mishra i/by Hulyalkar & Associates for applicants. Ms Shilpa Talhar a/w DJ Haldankar, APP for respondent/ State.
PSI Umaji Kadam, Dindoshi Police Station, Mumbai.
Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.
P.C. :
After hearing the matter for some time, the applicant’s learned Counsel, follwing instructions, seeks leave to withdraw both of these applications, with the liberty to approach the Sessions Court. Liberty granted as prayed for. Consequently, the applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
[ R. N. Laddha, J. ]
Rehan Iqbal Shaikh
State of Maharashtra
Vinay Sarwan Mehta
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
