Disposed

Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd. v. Bhavna Anil Yeole

Bombay HC26 Apr 2024FA/525/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First Appeal listed for third time for supply of copies; appellant's advocate defaulted despite four weeks' time. Registrar granted a final two weeks to supply copies, failing which the appeal and any interim application would stand dismissed against respondent No. 3.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks granted to supply copies; on failure the appeal stands dismissed against respondent No. 3 without further reference to the Registrar.

Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd. vs Bhavna… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

FIRST APPEAL NO. 525 OF 2024

¶3

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 26/06/2024

¶6

None Present

¶7

The above numbered First Appeal is listed for third time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already four weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting four weeks time, the Advocate for the Appellant has not supplied copies for issuing Notice to the respondent No. 3.

¶8

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.

¶9

As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 04 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate

¶10

for the Appellant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

¶11

In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, First Appeal alongwith Interim Application, if any would stand dismissed against respondent No. 3 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, notice returnable date be extended for ten weeks

¶12

Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶13

sat-R(J-II)-26.06.2024

Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd. v. Bhavna Anil Yeole

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd. v. Bhavna Anil Yeole

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dipali Sudhakar Pawar vs Sudhakar Dnyandeo Pawar

Mrs. Dipti Vivekanand Bijgarni vs Shri. Vivekanand Vasant Bijgarani

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Thr. Divisional Controller, Nashik vs Sugandha Mahendra Salve (Handicap) Thr. Mahendra Shivram Salve

Dipti Sandip Gaikwad vs Sandip Jaywant Gaikwad

Dilip Jagannath Bayad Vs Ashok Bansilal Bora and Another

Dadarao Vithalroa Khatake and Anr. Vs the Depot Manager, M.S.R.T.C. Latur and Ors.