Disposed

Mrs. Dipti Vivekanand Bijgarni v. Shri. Vivekanand Vasant Bijgarani

Bombay HC26 Mar 2024MCA/56/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Wife sought transfer of her husband's divorce petition from Family Court Pune to Family Court Bandra, citing custody of two minor daughters and no independent income. The court allowed the transfer and permitted the husband to appear by video conferencing.

What did the court decide?

Matrimonial Petition No.A2143 of 2023 transferred from Family Court Pune to Family Court Bandra; husband may appear via video conferencing.

Mrs. Dipti Vivekanand Bijgarni vs Shri. Vivekanand… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

23-mca-56-2024.doc

¶2

hShubhada S Kadam

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2024

¶4

Dipti Vivekanand Bijgarni

¶5

… Applicant

¶6

versus

¶7

Vivekanand Vasant Bijgarani

¶8

…. Respondent

¶9

Mr. Amol L. Dhumal i/b. Mr. Vijay Kokitkar, Advocate for the Applicant.

¶10

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

¶11

DATE : 22^nd JULY, 2024.

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant.

¶14

By an order dated 24^th June 2024, the matter was adjourned so as to enable the respondent to appear in the matter, however till date, none has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent.

¶15

The learned counsel appearing for the applicant-wife submits that the applicant married the respondent on 17^th May 2009 and out of the marriage, they have two daughters aged 14 years and 11 years. Both the minor daughters are staying with the applicant-wife in Mumbai. The applicant is a housewife and has no source of income. Whereas the respondent-husband has a shop running business of photography. The Digitally signed by SHUBHADA learned counsel submits that the applicant-wife has to maintain her two SHUBHADA SHANKAR SHANKAR KADAM KADAM Date: 2024.07.24 daughters. He submits that the applicant-wife has also filed 14:26:06 +0530

¶16

1/3

¶17

23-mca-56-2024.doc

¶18

hShubhada S Kadam

¶19

an application for restitution of conjugal rights on 16^th October 2023 in the Family Court at Bandra. Thereafter, the respondent-husband has filed divorce proceedings before the Family Court at Pune. Learned counsel submits that it would be extremely difficult for the applicant-wife to defend the divorce proceedings before the Family Court at Pune. He further submits that divorce proceedings be transferred and both the proceedings be conducted in the Family Court at Bandra.

¶20

Considering the submissions made, which are not contested by the respondent-husband, more particularly when the applicant-wife has custody of two daughters and she is staying in Mumbai and has no source of maintenance and she is dependent on her parents, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) as under :

¶21

(a) That this Hon'ble Court be please to pass an order directing the Learned Family Court, Pune to transfer the said proceedings i.e. Matrimonial Petition No.A2143 of 2023 to the Court of Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai and the parties be directed to attend the said proceedings before the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai.

¶22

On such transfer, it is directed that the applicant-wife would not seek adjournments in the matter without informing the respondenthusband well in advance so to avoid inconvenience to the husband to travel to Mumbai, so also, the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai, is directed

¶23

2/3

¶24

23-mca-56-2024.doc

¶25

hShubhada S Kadam

¶26

to permit the respondent-husband to appear through video conferencing

¶27

wherever possible.

¶28

With the above observations, the application is disposed of.

¶29

(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)

¶30

3/3

Mrs. Dipti Vivekanand Bijgarni v. Shri. Vivekanand Vasant Bijgarani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Dipti Vivekanand Bijgarni v. Shri. Vivekanand Vasant Bijgarani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dipali Sudhakar Pawar vs Sudhakar Dnyandeo Pawar

Mr. Yashwantrao Govindrao Ghorpade and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Vandana Raju Kokane and Ors. vs the Oriental Insurance Co. Limited, Pune

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd.,Mumbai vs Dhanaji Shrirang Pisal and Anr.

Smt Devibai Nankchand Relan Since Deceased His Legal Heirs Nandakishore Nanakchand Relan vs Nitin Raut Deputy Collectr

Bhakti Milind Sutar vs Milind Dattatray Sutar