Reliance Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Mrs. Nanda Krishna Gosavi (Delelted) and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
First appeal listed for supply of copies; appellant failed to comply despite four weeks' time. Registrar granted one last opportunity of three weeks to supply copies, with automatic dismissal against respondent No. 4 on default.
What did the court decide?
Three weeks granted to appellant to supply copies for notice to respondent No. 4, failing which automatic dismissal.
What the court decided
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 364 OF 2024 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6622 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 364 OF 2024
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)
DATE : 23/07/2024
None Present
The above numbered First Appeal alongwith Interim Application is listed for third time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already four weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting four weeks time, the Advocate for the Appellant has not supplied copies for issuing Notice to respondent No. 4.
In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute. As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 04
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondent No. 4
Coram
S. R. Agrawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court