Interim application in a pending first appeal; the court, after hearing both sides and considering reasons in the application, allowed it in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-ia-6337-2024-fast-31970-2018.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6337 OF 2024
IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 31970 of 2018
| Bhagyashri Sanjay Gurjar | … Applicant/ Appellant |
|---|---|
| versus | |
| Lirin Roadlines Pvt. Ltd. and ors. | …. Respondents |
Ms. Ketki Gokhale i/b. Mr. Avinash M. Gokhale, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant.
Mr. C. M. Lokesh, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 8th MARCH, 2024.
P.C. :
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2024.03.11 16:26:19 +0530
1/1
Bhagyashri Sanjay Gurjar
Lirin Roadlines Pvt. Ltd.
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
