Disposed

Mr. Kaitan Fransis Fernandis and Anr. v. Bajaj Aliens General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Sept 2024FA/1435/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First appeal listed for non-supply of copies for issuing notices to respondents. The Registrar granted one final opportunity of two weeks to supply copies, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed against respondent nos. 1 to 5 without further reference.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks granted to supply copies; on default the First Appeal stands dismissed against respondent nos. 1 to 5 without further reference.

Mr. Kaitan Fransis Fernandis and Anr. vs Bajaj… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1435 OF 2024

¶3

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 25/09/2024

¶6

None present

¶7

The above numbered First Appeal is listed for second time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already two weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting two weeks time, the Advocate for the Appellant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to respondent nos. 1 to 5.

¶8

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.

¶9

As such, the prescribed time to supply copies,

¶10

as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

¶11

In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, the First Appeal would stand dismissed against respondent nos. 1 to 5 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, notice returnable date be extended by 10 weeks.

¶12

Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶13

sat-R(J-II)-25.09.2024

Mr. Kaitan Fransis Fernandis and Anr. v. Bajaj Aliens General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Kaitan Fransis Fernandis and Anr. v. Bajaj Aliens General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shekhar Dagdu Kothavade vs Union of India, through Commanding Officer

weston decor private limited vs Arun N Bidwai

Ashish Mansing Shinde vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Wasim Munir Syed vs the State of Maharashtra

Digambar Alias Rakesh Gopal Nalawade vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Mohammad Imtiyaz Khan vs the State of Maharashtra