Dismissed

V.I.D.C. Thr. Exe. Engineer, Bembla Irrigation Division(Earlier, Bembla Canal Proj. Div.), Yavatmal v. Niranjan Maroti Niranje and Others

Bombay HC6 Mar 2024FA/143/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Land acquired for Bembla Project; reference Court enhanced compensation using a sale deed from adjacent village Wadhona Bazar with a 15% deduction. The acquiring body's appeals challenged the valuation. High Court found no error in the reference Court's determination and dismissed all appeals.

What the court decided

AI extract

V.I.D.C. Thr. Exe. Engineer, Bembla Irrigation… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:5760

¶2

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt

¶3

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶5

FIRST APPEAL NO. 358 OF 2020 FIRST APPEAL NO. 161 OF 2021 FIRST APPEAL NO. 162 OF 2021 FIRST APPEAL NO. 165 OF 2021 FIRST APPEAL NO. 389 OF 2021 FIRST APPEAL NO. 537 OF 2021 FIRST APPEAL NO. 540 OF 2021 FIRST APPEAL NO. 379 OF 2022 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1018 OF 2022 FIRST APPEAL NO. 170 OF 2023 FIRST APPEAL NO. 143 OF 2024 FIRST APPEAL NO. 06 OF 2020

¶6

FIRST APPEAL NO. 358 OF 2020

¶7

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, through Executive Engineer, Nimna Painganga Project Division, Yavatmal, Tq. and Distt. Yavatmal

¶8

... APPELLANT

¶9

// V E R S U S //

¶10

Devidas Shamrao Tijare (Deceased) Through his legal heirs

¶11

(a) Smt. Indubai Devidas Tijare , Aged 78 Yrs., Occu.: Housewife,

¶12

(b) Sau Suman Bharatrao Raut, Aged 48 Yrs., Occu.: Housewife,

¶13

¶14

(d) Shri Dhanraj Devidas Tijare, Aged 44 Yrs., Occu.: Agriculturist,

¶15

(e) Shri Hemraj Devidas Tijare, Aged 42 Yrs., Occu.: Agriculturist,

¶16

(f) Shri Jagdish Devidas Tijare, Aged 39 Yrs., Occu.: Agriculturist,

¶17

R/o. Chikhali, Tal Ralegaon, Distt. Yavatmal

¶18

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt 2

¶19

State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Yavatmal Dist. Yavatmal 3. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bembla Project Yavatmal, Tq. and Dist. Yavatmal ... RESPONDENTS ----------------------------------- ---------- -----------------------------------------------------------Mr. H. D. Marathe, Advocate for the appellant. Mr A. R. Ingole, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1(a) to 1(f) Ms Sonia Thakur, AGP for respondent Nos. 2 and 3/State. ---------------------------------- ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 161 OF 2021 Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, through its Executive Engineer, Bembla Irrigation Division, (Earlier known as Bembla Canal Project), Yavatmal, District Yavatmal ... APPELLANT // V E R S U S // 1. Dhanraj Kavduji Umate, Aged Major, Occu.: Agriculturist, R/o. Chikhali, Tq. Ralegaon, District Yavatmal 2. State of Maharashtra, Through its Collector, Yavatmal 3. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bembla Project, Yeotmal District- Yavatmal ... RESPONDENTS -------------------------------- ---------- --------------------------------------------------------------Ms Ashwini Athalye, Advocate for the appellant. Mr A. R. Ingole, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr S. C. Joshi, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3/State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 162 OF 2021 Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, through its Executive Engineer, Nimna Painganga Project Division Yavatmal, (Earlier known as Bembla Canal Project Division), Yavatmal, ... APPELLANT

¶20

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt

District Yavatmal

// V E R S U S //

1.	Hanuman Kavduji Umate, Aged Major, Occu.: Agriculturist, All R/o. Chikhali, Tq. Ralegaon, District Yavatmal
2.	State of Maharashtra, Through its Collector, Yavatmal
3. -----	The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bembla Project, District- Yavatmal ... RESPONDENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----	Ms Ashwini Athalye, Advocate for the appellant. Mr A. R. Ingole, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms Kavita Bhondge, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3/State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 165 OF 2 021 Executive Engineer, Nimna Painganga Project Division, Yavatmal, Tahsil and District Yavatmal ... APPELLANT // V E R S U S //
1.	Vilas Kaduji Umate, Aged Major, Occu.: Agriculturist, R/o. Chikhali, Tah. Ralegaon & Dist: Yavatmal
2.	State of Maharashtra, Through its Collector, Yavatmal Tahsil and District Yavatmal
3. -----	Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bembla Project, Yavatmal, Tah. & Dist. Yavatmal ... RESPONDENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----	Ms I. P. Khisti, Advocate for the appellant. Mr A. R. Ingole, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr M. A. Kadu, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3/State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

¶25

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt

¶26

¶27

AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 389 OF 2021

¶28

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, through its Executive Engineer, Nimna Painganga Project Division, (Earlier known as Bembla Project Division), Yavatmal, District Yavatmal

¶29

... APPELLANT

¶30

// V E R S U S //

¶31

1. Rambhau Keshav Barde,

¶32

Sundarabai Rambhau Barde, Aged Major, Occu.: Agriculturist, R/o. Chikhali, Tq. Ralegaon, District Yavatmal

¶33

State of Maharashtra, Through its Collector, Yavatmal

¶34

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bembla Project, Yavatmal, District- Yavatmal ... RESPONDENTS

¶35

------------------------------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------------------Ms Ashwini Athalye, Advocate for the appellant. Mr Ashish Nakshane, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2 Ms M. R. Kavimandan, AGP for respondent Nos.3 and 4/State.

¶36

AND

¶37

FIRST APPEAL NO. 537 OF 2021

¶38

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, through its Executive Engineer, Nimna Painganga Project Division, (Earlier known as Bembla Canal Project Division), Yavatmal, District Yavatmal ... APPELLANT

¶39

// V E R S U S //

¶40

Namdeo Ramaji Umate, Aged Major, Occu.: Agriculturist, R/o. Chikhali, Tq. Ralegaon, District Yavatmal

¶41

State of Maharashtra,

¶42

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt

¶43

¶44

Through its Collector, Yavatmal

¶45

Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bembla Project, Yeotmal, District- Yavatmal ... RESPONDENTS --------------------------- ---------- -------------------------------------------------------------------Ms Ashwini Athalye, Advocate for the appellant. Mr A. R. Ingole, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms Prachi Joshi, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3/State.

¶46

AND

¶47

FIRST APPEAL NO. 540 OF 2021

¶48

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, through its Executive Engineer, Bembla Irrigation Division, (Earlier known as Bembla Canal Project), Yavatmal

¶49

... APPELLANT

¶50

// V E R S U S //

¶51

Rangrao S/o. Lakshaman Khaire, Aged Major, Occu.: Agriculturist, R/o. Chikhali, Tah. Ralegaon & Dist: Yavatmal 2. State of Maharashtra, Through its Collector, Yavatmal 3. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bembla Project Canal Division, Yavatmal

¶52

... RESPONDENTS

¶53

Ms Ashwini Athalye, Advocate for the appellant. Mr A. R. Ingole, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms Sonia Thakur, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3/State.

¶54

AND

¶55

FIRST APPEAL NO. 379 OF 2022

¶56

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, Through Executive Engineer, Bembla Canal Division, Yavatmal Taluka and District Yavatmal ... APPELLANT

¶57

// V E R S U S //

¶58

Sadanand Mohan Turale, Aged Major, Occu.: Agriculturist,

¶59

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt

¶60

¶61

	R/o. Chikhali (Vadhona Bazar), Taluka Ralegaon, District Yavatmal
2.	The State of Maharashtra, Through its Collector, Yavatmal District Yavatmal
3. -----	The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bembla Project, Yavatmal Taluka & District Yavatmal ... RESPONDENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----	Mr Amit Kukday, Advocate for the appellant. Ms Kavita Bhondge, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3/State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 1018 OF 2 022
1.	Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, through its Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division and Bembla Canal Division, Yavatmal, Tq. and Dist. Yavatmal
2.	The Executive Engineer, Bembla Canal Division, Yavatmal ... APPELLANTS
	// V E R S U S //
1.	Ashok Mohan Turale, Aged Major, Occu.: Agriculturist, R/o. Chikhali (Vadhona Bazar), Tq. Ralegaon, Dist: Yavatmal
2.	The State of Maharashtra, through its Collector, Yavatmal
3. -----	The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bembla Project Yavatmal, Tq. Dist. Yavatmal ... RESPONDENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----	Mr M. A. Kadu, Advocate for the appellants. Ms M. R. Kavimandan, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3/State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 170 OF 2 023
	Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, through Executive Engineer,

¶62

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt

¶63

¶64

	Nimna Painganga Project Division, Yavatmal, Tq and Dist. Yavatmal	... APPELLANT
	// V E R S U S //
1.	Bandu Meghshyam Vankar, Aged Major, Occu.: Agriculturist, R/o. Chikhali, Tq. Ralegaon, Dist. Yavatmal
2.	State of Maharashtra, Through Collector, Yavatmal Dist. Yavatmal
3. -----	Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bembla Project, Yavatmal Tq & Dist. Yavatmal --------------------------------------------------------------------------	... RESPONDENTS -------------------------
-----	Mr H. D. Marathe, Advocate for the appellant. Mr A. B. Nakshane, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr M. A. Kadu, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3/State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------	-------------------------
	AND FIRST APPEAL NO. 143 OF 2 024
	Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, Through its Executive Engineer, Bembla Irrigation Division, (Earlier known as Bembla Canal Project Division), Yavatmal District Yavatmal	... APPELLANT
	// V E R S U S //
1.	Niranjan Maroti Naranje, Aged Major, Occu.: Agriculturist, R/o. Chikhali, Taq. Ralegaon, District Yavatmal
2.	State of Maharashtra, Through its Collector, Yavatmal
3.	The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Minor Irrigation Works No.2, Yavatmal District Yavatmal	... RESPONDENTS

¶65

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt

¶66

¶67

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ms Ashwini Athalye, Advocate for the appellant. Mr A. B. Nakshane, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms Prachi Joshi, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3/State.

¶68

AND

¶69

FIRST APPEAL NO. 06 OF 2020

¶70

Executive Engineer, Nimna Painganga Project Division, Tahsil and District Yavatmal ... APPELLANT // V E R S U S // 1. Bhaskar Nago Nagpure, Aged Major, Occu.: Agriculturist, R/o. Chikhali, Tah. Ralegaon & Dist: Yavatmal 2. State of Maharashtra, Through its Collector, Yavatmal Tahsil and District Yavatmal 3. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bembla Project, Yavatmal, Tah. & Dist. Yavatmal ... RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ms Ira P. Khisti, Advocate for the appellant. Mr A. B. Nakshane, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr M. A. Kadu, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3/State. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : G. A. SANAP, J. DATE : 08/05/2024 O R A L J U D G M E N T :

¶71

1 Heard finally with the consent of learned Advocates for the parties.

¶72

2 The lands in all these appeals were acquired for the

¶73

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt 9

¶74

purpose of the Bembla Project. Out of these appeals, the lands in First Appeal No. 1018 of 2022 and First Appeal No. 379 of 2022 were seasonally irrigated and the lands in rest of the appeals were dry crop lands. The market price determined by the reference Court for seasonally irrigated lands was Rs.6,08,248/- (Rupees Six Lacs Eight Thousand Two Hundred and Forty Eight only) per hectare and for dry crop lands @ Rs.4,46,050/-(Rupees Four Lacs Forty Six Thousand Fifty only) per hectare. In all the references, the land was situated at village Chikhli and for the purpose of determining the market price, the sale deed dated 30.05.2007 of a land bearing Gat No. 149/2 situated at village Wadhona Bazar, Tq. Ralegaon has been taken into consideration. In view of this, all the appeals are being disposed of by common judgment.

¶75

3 The land in all the appeals was acquired pursuant to the notification published in the official gazette under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 dated

¶76

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt 10

¶77

13.03.2008 and 03.01.2008. The award was passed on 08.06.2009 and 10.12.2009. The land acquisition officer determined the market price of the land in all the appeals @ of Rs.90,000/- per hectare for dry crop land and Rs.81,200/- per hectare for seasonally irrigated land. The respective claimants/ land owners in all the appeals filed the reference before the Collector, Yavatmal. The Collector, Yavatmal made over the references to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Yavatmal (for short ‘the reference Court’).

¶78

4 The parties adduced the evidence before the

¶79

reference Court. Learned reference Court in the references pertaining to dry crop land determined the market price @ of Rs.4,46,050/- per hectare and pertaining to seasonally irrigated land @ of Rs.6,08,248/- per hectare. Being aggrieved by this, the acquiring body has filed these appeals.

¶80

5 I have heard learned Advocates for the parties.

¶81

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt 11

¶82

Perused the record and proceedings.

¶83

6 In the facts and circumstances, following points

¶84

fall for my determination:

¶85

(i) Whether the market price of the seasonally irrigated land determined @ of Rs.6,08,248/- per

¶86

hectare is just, proper and reasonable ?

¶87

(ii) Whether the market price of the dry crop land determined @ of Rs.4,46,050/- per hectare is just, proper and reasonable ?

¶88

7 Learned Advocate for the appellant-acquiring body submitted that the reference Court has awarded excessive and

¶89

exorbitant compensation by relying upon the sale deed of an adjacent village. Learned Advocate submitted that the reasons recorded by the reference Court for placing implicit reliance on the said sale deed are not convincing. Learned Advocate submitted that there is no iota of evidence on record to prove that the market price determined by the land acquisition

¶90

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt 12

¶91

officer was not just, proper and reasonable.

¶92

8 Learned Advocates appearing for the claimants

¶93

submitted that there was no sale instance available from village Chikhli where the lands in all the appeals are situated. Learned Advocates submitted that the sale deed which has been made the basis for determining the compensation was of a land situated at Wadhona Bazar. Village Wadhona Bazar is not far away from village Chikhli. Learned Advocates submitted that the claimants have proved that the said sale deed was a genuine sale transaction and therefore, the reliance placed on the said sale deed by the reference Court was in accordance with law. Learned Advocates further pointed out that considering the minus factors vis-a-vis the land situated at village Chikhli, the reference Court has made a 15% deduction from the market value of the land mentioned in the sale deed. Learned Advocates submitted that the exemplar sale deed was in respect of land admeasuring 1.70 hectares.

¶94

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt 13

¶95

9 I have perused the record and proceedings. I have

¶96

gone through the judgment and award passed by the reference Court in all the reference cases. The land subject matter of relied sale deed is located on the Ralegaon-Wadaki State Highway. There are hardly 4 to 5 fields in between the acquired land in all the appeals and village Wadhona Bazar. Compared to Wadhona Bazar, Chikhli is a small town. It is evident from the award that Ralegaon-Wadki Road is 100 mtrs. away from village Chikhli. Village Chikhli is at a distance of 12 km from Tahsil place Ralegaon. Considering the distance between the acquired land and the land of the sale instance, the reference Court in all the references concluded that the sale deed of village Wadhona Bazar, subject to reasonable deductions, can be made basis for determining the market price of the land acquired in all the references.

¶97

10 The exemplar sale deed was executed on 30.05.2007. It was in respect of 1.70 hectare of land. The

¶98

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt 14

¶99

acquiring body has not adduced oral evidence to rebut the evidence adduced by the claimants. On the basis of the evidence adduced by the claimants, it has been proved that the sale transaction was a bona fide sale transaction. As per the sale deed, the land was sold @ of Rs.4,77,058/- per hectare. The reference Court has recorded the reasons for placing implicit reliance on the sale deed. It needs to be stated that in the absence of a sale instance of a particular village for the relevant period, the sale instance of the land from the adjacent village can be taken into consideration. However, while determining the price on the basis of such a sale deed, the Court has to consider plus and minus factors. In this case, the reference Court has recorded the reasons for placing implicit reliance on the said sale deed. There is hardly any evidence to show that this sale deed was brought into existence to inflate the price of the land in anticipation of the acquisition of the land in the area. It has been proved that for the relevant

¶100

64 fa 358.2020+12 covered judgment of land acquisition.odt 15

¶101

period there was no sale instance of a land at village Chikhli. The reference Court has made a 15% deduction and came to

¶102

the conclusion that the market price of the acquired land on the date of the Section 4 notification would be Rs.4,46,050/-.

¶103

On going through the materials on record, I am satisfied that the reference Court has not committed any mistake or error. The oral evidence adduced by the claimants in all the references, as well as the documentary evidence, is sufficient to conclude that there is no substance in all these appeals. Accordingly, I answer point Nos. 1 and 2 in the affirmative.

¶104

11 In view of this finding, the appeals deserve to be dismissed. Accordingly, all first appeals stand dismissed . No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶105

(G. A. SANAP, J.)

¶106

Namrata

¶107

Signed by: Miss Namrata Suryawanshi Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 22/05/2024 11:14:32

V.I.D.C. Thr. Exe. Engineer, Bembla Irrigation Division(Earlier, Bembla Canal Proj. Div.), Yavatmal v. Niranjan Maroti Niranje and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

V.I.D.C. Thr. Exe. Engineer, Bembla Irrigation Division(Earlier, Bembla Canal Proj. Div.), Yavatmal v. Niranjan Maroti Niranje and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Narendra S/O Chuhadram Sharma Vs Union of India, Thr. General Manager, Central Railway C.S.M.T. Mumbai

Arun S/O Onkar Tayade Vs Gulab Rabbani S/O S.K. Harun and 2 Ors.

Ramesh S/O Haribhau Gabhane (Died) and Another Vs Union of India, Thr. General Manager, Central Railway, Csmt Mumbai

State of Mah. Thr. Collector, Nagpur and 2 Ors. Vs Ramu S/O Khema Patil

Maha. State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. Thr. Superintendant Engineer, Chandrapur and Another Vs Smt. Malan Wd/O Ramu Alam and Others

Shri Pandurang Kashinath Ingle (Died) Thr. Lrs Shri Santosh S/O Pandurangji Ingle and 4 Others Vs the State of Maharashtra Represented by Collector, Yavatmal and 2 Others