Arun S/O Onkar Tayade v. Gulab Rabbani S/O S.K. Harun and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a brief procedural order directing the registry to withhold the withdrawal of a compensation amount until deficit court fees are deposited by the claimant.
What the court decided
9 fa 64-2010.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
FIRST APPEAL NO. 64/2010 (D) Arun s/o Onkar Tayade Vs.
Gulab Rabbani s/o S.K. Harun and another
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATE : 20.11.2025
The record demonstrates the fact that since January 2024, the matter is adjourned for one or other reason and till date, deficit Court fees is not deposited in the matter.
- In view of this, the Registry of this Court is directed that claimant shall not be permitted to withdraw the compensation amount unless deficit Court fees is deposited by them.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL J.)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Arun s/o Onkar Tayade
- respondent
Gulab Rabbani s/o S.K. Harun and another
Coram
Pravin S. Patil
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Nitin Arvind Deshmukh (Dead) Thr. Lr Sa Deshmukh Vs State of Mah. Thr. Collector, Amravati and 2 Ors.
Dinesh S/O Suryabhan Talware Vs State of Maharashtra through Collector, Yavatmal and 2 Others
Kalpesh Oil Plant Thr. Its Prop., Chandrashekhar Leelaram Nimje, Mouda Vs Shri Raju S/O Sukkul Akare and Another
V.I.D.C. Thr. Exe. Engineer, Bembla Irrigation Division, Yavatmal (Earlier Nimn Painganga Project) vs Sau. Archana Bhauraoji Dharme and Others