In this contempt petition, the court disposed of the proceeding as not pressed, noting that the parties submitted the underlying issue had been resolved and nothing survived for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:1987
Diksha Rane 10.CP 519-22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.519/2022
M/S. RAINBOW IRON AND STEEL ..PETITIONER VS.
M/S. CHEVRON METAL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD AND ORS. ..RESPONDENTS
Adv. Sujit Mashal i/b. Adv. Nasikwala Law OfÏce for the petitioner.
Adv. Divya Wadekar i/b. Adv. Rahul Oak for the respondents.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JANUARY 16, 2024.
P.C. :
1. The parties submit that the issue has been resolved and nothing survives for consideration in the present contempt petition. In this view of the matter, the contempt petition is not press by the petitioner.
2. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, the contempt petition is disposed of as not pressed.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
M/s. Rainbow Iron and Steel
M/s. Chevron Metal Products Pvt. Ltd and Ors.
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
