Contempt petition regarding demolition of illegal structures was disposed of after the court found that the order of the Respondent Corporation had been complied with.
Contempt Petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 929 cp48.2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.48/2023 IN WRIT PETITION NOS.5692/2013 & 2456/2017
(Sou. Roopa w/o Sanjay Mukte Vs. Nagpur Municipal Corportion and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S.N. Mahajan, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. J.B. Kasat, Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr. M.R.Joharapurkar, Advocate for the Intervenors. Mr. P.J. Mehta Advocate for Intervenors.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 06, 2024.
Heard.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Mukund Ambulkar
Sou. Roopa w/o Sanjay Mukte
Nagpur Municipal Corporation
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
