Basavaraj Gangappa Badga v. Sheetal Teli Ugale
Bombay HCCP/34/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A listing order: matters on the Board could not be heard for paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; existing interim orders to continue; affidavits and a fresh hearing schedule set.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
.. 1 .. common order 16.10.24
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE :- 16th OCTOBER, 2024
¶4
P.C :-
¶5
- At the time of rising at 6.30 pm, the matters mentioned in the
¶6
chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶7
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶8
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶9
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
¶10
before the next date.
¶11
- Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra V. Ghuge
M.M. Sathaye
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Abbas Aabid Hussain Chawre vs the State of Maharahtra Thr Municipal Commissioner and Anr.
Prasad Vinayak Patil vs State of Maharashtra Throu. Chief Sec. Ministry of Transport (Msrtc) and Anr. )
Pradnya Narendra Kamble and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thru the Secretary, Dept. of School Edu. and Sports and Ors.
Gaurav Pradip Palsule vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary. and Ors.